Abstract
Experts generally believe that written corrective feedback (CF) positively affects writing quality and learners’ accurate use of language. However, researchers have not yet identified the most effective type of written CF or sufficiently explored the relation between type of written CF and targeted linguistic category. Thus, this study investigated the effects of metalinguistic explanation and direct correction on Chinese English as a foreign language learners’ correct use of 3 different linguistic categories. The study involved 75 university students who were divided into 3 groups: a metalinguistic explanation group, a direct correction group, and a control group. Using a mixed-methods approach, we found significant differences among the 3 groups and found that direct correction was particularly effective when treating the irregular past tense. However, in a follow-up case study, no evidence indicated the ineffectiveness of either metalinguistic explanation or direct correction for any of the targeted linguistic categories. We discuss implications for future studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.