Abstract
The antiasthmatic effect of i.v. injection of theophylline was compared with that of aminophylline by using an antigen-induced bronchoconstriction model in sensitized guinea pigs. Both theophylline and aminophylline showed dose-dependent inhibition of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction. Statistically significant differences were observed at theophylline doses of 20 and 40 mg/kg and at aminophylline doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg. Thus, antiasthmatic effects of both drugs appeared to be similar. In addition, intravenous ethylenediamine did not influence either airflow in normal guinea pigs or bronchoconstriction induced by antigen at doses up to 30 mg/kg. In conclusion, the ethylenediamine in aminophylline may not influence the antiasthmatic action of theophylline, and the therapeutic effects of theophylline and aminophylline are suggested to be similar.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
