Abstract

Students’ ability to assess their own knowledge is an important skill in science education. However, students often overestimate their actual performances. In such cases, overconfidence bias arises. Previous studies in physics education have shown that overconfidence bias concerns mainly content areas, such as Newtonian mechanics, where misconceptions are strongly held by students. However, how the received instruction and the levels of understanding of a given topic influence overconfidence bias is yet to be proved. In this paper, we address this issue choosing as content area introductory quantum mechanics (QM). Overall, 408 high school students were involved in the study and randomly assigned to two experimental groups. One group received a textbook-based instruction about introductory QM, whereas the other one received instruction on the same topics through an innovative guided inquiry teaching-learning sequence (TLS), which included also potential pedagogical countermeasures for overconfidence bias. Students of both experimental groups completed a multiple-choice questionnaire and indicated for each item the degree of their confidence in the given answer using a 5-point Likert scale. The overconfidence bias was quantitatively defined and evaluated at person level using a 1D Rasch model. Progress in knowledge about the targeted topics was modeled according to a construct map validated in a previous paper. Results show that, for the whole sample, the overconfidence bias decreased as students progressed along the levels of the construct map. However, findings indicate that students of the TLS group achieved a significantly higher accuracy and a better confidence calibration, while the textbook group exhibited a lower performance and a significantly greater overconfidence bias. Implications for research into overconfidence bias in physics education are briefly discussed.3 MoreReceived 24 November 2019Accepted 29 May 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010143Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasAssessmentEpistemology, attitudes, & beliefsInstructional strategiesProfessional TopicsK-12 studentsPhysics Education Research

Highlights

  • Students’ belief in their own ability—usually defined as confidence—has been historically associated in educational studies with motivation, interest, and decision making [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]

  • Previous studies in physics education have shown that overconfidence bias concerns mainly content areas, such as Newtonian mechanics, where misconceptions are strongly held by students

  • How the received instruction and the levels of understanding of a given topic influence overconfidence bias is yet to be proved. We address this issue choosing as content area introductory quantum mechanics (QM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Students’ belief in their own ability—usually defined as confidence—has been historically associated in educational studies with motivation, interest, and decision making [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. While the method was primarily suggested as a valuable aid for teachers or university instructors, it received attention from scholars in physics education to validate multitiered diagnostic instruments aimed to identify misconceptions in a variety of content areas [29,30,31,32,33]. Among these studies, only four focused at a deeper level on the relationship between students’ confidence and ability [34,35,36,37]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.