Abstract
We retrospectively compared induction therapy utilizing alemtuzumab and antithymoglobulin (ATG) in high-risk kidney transplant recipients in our center. Two hundred and fifty-one patients underwent kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2012. The high-risk patients were defined as those who had two or more times kidney transplantation and/or more than 30% panel reactive antibody. We studied 130 high-risk kidney transplant candidate; 58 (44.6%) patients received induction immunosuppressive therapy with alemtuzumab, and 72 (55.4%) with ATG. Delayed graft function developed in 11 patients receiving alemtuzumab, against the 27 patients who receiving ATG (P = 0.021). Acute cellular rejection episodes were observed in five patients in the alemtuzumab group and 19 patients in the ATG group (P = 0.009). There were three graft failures in the alemtuzumab group and eight graft failures in the ATG group due to rejection episodes. We found immunosuppressive induction therapy with alemtuzumab a significantly less incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function than induction therapy with ATG in the high-risk kidney transplant recipients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
