Abstract

The evolution of conspicuous begging displays has been suggested as the outcome of a conflict where offspring attempt to manipulate food allocation beyond the parental optimum. One resolution for the conflict arises via costs of begging, and oxidative stress has been proposed as a major mechanism for causing begging-induced costs. Although begging can be a physically demanding activity, the evidence for causing oxidative stress is scarce. Great tit (Parus major) parents provide food at the nest mostly from 2 different locations, which in consequence relaxes nestling competition. Here, we manipulated nestling competition by forcing parents to feed from a single location and supplemented half of the nestlings in each brood with vitamin E to test if this major antioxidant can alleviate a potential oxidative cost of begging. The design increases the cost of begging without altering parental feeding rates. Begging intensity was significantly higher when parents fed from a single location. Body mass and antioxidant capacity were not affected by the increase in begging, but oxidative damage was lower in females of the increased begging group compared with those in the control group, independent of vitamin E supplementation. The results suggest that oxidative stress is rather a minor cost of begging. Vitamin E–supplemented nestlings had a higher probability to fledge, which underlines the important role of vitamin E during development, although this might not be due to its role as an antioxidant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call