Abstract

BackgroundAnticipatory and compensatory balance responses are used by the central nervous system (CNS) to preserve balance, hence they significantly contribute to the understanding of physiological mechanisms of postural control. It is well established that various sensory systems contribute to the regulation of balance. However, it is still unclear which role each individual sensory system (e.g. plantar mechanoreceptors) plays in balance regulation. This becomes also evident in various patient populations, for instance in diabetics with reduced plantar sensitivity. To investigate these sensory mechanisms, approaches like hypothermia to deliberately reduce plantar afferent input have been applied. But there are some limitations regarding hypothermic procedures in previous studies: Not only plantar aspects of the feet might be affected and maintaining the hypothermic effect during data collection. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to induce a permanent and controlled plantar hypothermia and to examine its effects on anticipatory and compensatory balance responses. We hypothesized deteriorations in anticipatory and compensatory balance responses as increased center of pressure excursions (COP) and electromyographic activity (EMG) in response to the hypothermic plantar procedure. 52 healthy and young subjects (23.6 ± 3.0 years) performed balance tests (unexpected perturbations). Subjects’ foot soles were exposed to three temperatures while standing upright: 25, 12 and 0 °C. COP and EMG were analyzed during two intervals of anticipatory and one interval of compensatory balance responses (intervals 0, 1 and 2, respectively).ResultsSimilar plantar temperatures confirmed the successful implementation of the thermal platform. No significant COP and EMG differences were found for the anticipatory responses (intervals 0 and 1) under the hyperthermia procedure. Parameters in interval 2 showed generally decreased values in response to cooling.ConclusionNo changes in anticipatory responses were found possibly due to sensory compensation processes of other intact afferents. Decreased compensatory responses may be interpreted as the additional balance threat, creating a more cautious behavior causing the CNS to generate a kind of over-compensatory behavior. Contrary to the expectations, there were different anticipatory and compensatory responses after reduced plantar inputs, thereby, revealing alterations in the organization of CNS inputs and outputs according to different task difficulties.

Highlights

  • Anticipatory and compensatory balance responses are used by the central nervous system (CNS) to preserve balance, they significantly contribute to the understanding of physiological mechanisms of postural control

  • The protocol using the thermal platform was successfully implemented since the plantar foot temperatures were similar pre and post trials

  • Anticipatory responses in intervals 0 and 1 revealed no significant differences as plantar temperatures were reduced. This might be explained by a compensation of the impaired afferent inputs by other intact inputs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anticipatory and compensatory balance responses are used by the central nervous system (CNS) to preserve balance, they significantly contribute to the understanding of physiological mechanisms of postural control. According to Santos et al [2], the function of the anticipatory adjustments is to minimize the effect of the forthcoming body perturbations with some corrections while the function of the compensatory responses is to restore the balance after a perturbation has already occurred In this way, both anticipatory and compensatory responses start with afferent information and they include activation or inhibition of muscles involved in postural control. Since our setup induced horizontal translational perturbations at the subjects’ feet, in which muscle latencies occur at around 100 ms and active COP displacements at around 130 ms post perturbation [34,35,36], interval 2 was chosen to analyze compensatory responses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call