Abstract
Thiazide diuretics have been shown to decrease bone loss and improve bone mineral density, while long-term furosemide therapy has been suggested to decrease bone mineral content. However, the direct effects of these diuretics on osteoblastic cells are not well established. Some investigators have reported direct effects of thiazides on osteoblastic cells but the results remain controversial, and there are few data about the direct effect of furosemide on osteoblastic cells. We investigated the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and furosemide on proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, osteocalcin, and interleukin-6/interleukin-11 (IL-6/IL-11) secretion in cultured normal human bone marrow stromal osteoprogenitor cells (hBMSCs). Treatment with HCTZ or furosemide for 24 hours in the concentration range of 10(-6) to 10(-4) mol/L did not affect 3H-thymidine incorporation in hBMSCs. Cellular alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin production were not changed significantly by treatment with HCTZ or furosemide (up to 10(-4) mol/L) during culture. There was also no significant difference in IL-6 and IL-11 production in hBMSCs. These results suggested that HCTZ or furosemide had no significant direct effect on proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, osteocalcin, and IL-6/IL-11 production in hBMSCs, and the effects of these diuretics on bone mass may be related to the indirect action on calcium balance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
