Abstract

The exceptional properties of Heat Resistant Super Alloys (HRSA) justify the search for advanced technologies that can improve the capability of machining these materials. One such advanced technology is the application of a coolant at high pressure while machining, a strategic solution known for at least six decades. The aim is to achieve extended tool life, better chip control and improved surface finish. Another aim is to control the temperature in the workpiece/tool interface targeting for optimum cutting conditions. In most of the existing applications with high-pressure coolant media, the nozzles are positioned on the rake face side of the insert and they are directed towards the cutting edge (the high-temperature area). The coolant is applied at high-pressure to improve the penetration of the cooling media along the cutting edge in the interface between the insert and workpiece material (chip) as well as to increase chip breakability. However, the corresponding infusion of coolant media in the interface between the flank face of the insert and the work material (tertiary shear zone) has been previously only scarcely addressed, as is the combined effect of coolant applications on rake and clearance sides of the insert. The present work addresses the influence of different pressure conditions in (flank: 0, 4 and 8 MPa; rake: 8 and 16 MPa) on maximum flank wear, flank wear area, tool wear mechanism, and overall process performance. Round uncoated inserts are used in a set of face turning experiments, conducted on the widely used HRSA “Alloy 718” and run in two condition tests with respect to cutting speed (45 (low) and 90 (high) m/min). The results show that an increase in rake pressure from 8 to 16 MPa has certainly a positive impact on tool life. Furthermore, at higher vc of 90 m/min, cutting edge deterioration: due to an extensive abrasion and crack in the wear zone were the dominant wear mechanism. Nevertheless, the increase in coolant pressure condition to 16 MPa reduced the amount of abrasion on the tool compared to 8 MPa. At the lower cutting speed, no crack or plastic deformation or extensive abrasion were found. When using 8 MPa pressure of coolant media on the flank, the wear was reduced by 20% compared to flood cooling conditions. Application of high-pressure cooling on the flank face has a positive effect on tool life and overall machining performance of Alloy 718.

Highlights

  • Heat resistant super alloys have a self-evident place in the material shelf of the aerospace industry, in particular for various engine applications

  • The results show that applying coolant media at a high pressure of 16 MPa on the rake face has a significant effect on the mechanical force to penetrate close to the cutting edge, reducing the thermo-mechanical load on the rake face, leading to lower the tool wear

  • Tool wear investigations were focused in different areas such as maximum flank wear, flank wear area, wear mechanism in machining Alloy 718 with cemented tungsten carbide tools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heat resistant super alloys have a self-evident place in the material shelf of the aerospace industry, in particular for various engine applications. Almost 50% of the high-performance components used in the hot sections of a jet engine are made from nickel-based super alloys [1] Their exceptional material characteristics, such as retained mechanical and thermal properties at elevated temperatures and further, their corrosive and creep resistance, make them very attractive for many high temperature applications as compared to other alloys. Alloy 718's ability to retain its mechanical properties at elevated temperatures and good welding properties makes it the natural “first choice” for jet engine components. When it comes to machining, Alloy 718 generally exhibits low machinability indexes. As a result, accumulated heat in the cutting zone leads to intense tool wear and machining parameters have to be restricted in order to keep the service life of the tools and the material removal rate at industrially reasonable levels

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call