Abstract

Objective: Limitations with manual dexterity are an important problem for patients suffering from hemiparesis post stroke. Sensorimotor deficits, compensatory strategies and the use of alternative grasping configurations may influence the efficiency of prehensile motor behavior. The aim of the present study is to examine how different grasp configurations affect patient ability to regulate both grip forces and object orientation when lifting, holding and placing an object.Methods: Twelve stroke patients with mild to moderate hemiparesis were recruited. Each was required to lift, hold and replace an instrumented object. Four different grasp configurations were tested on both the hemiparetic and less affected arms. Load cells from each of the 6 faces of the instrumented object and an integrated inertial measurement unit were used to extract data regarding the timing of unloading/loading phases, regulation of grip forces, and object orientation throughout the task.Results: Grip forces were greatest when using a palmar-digital grasp and lowest when using a top grasp. The time delay between peak acceleration and maximum grip force was also greatest for palmar-digital grasp and lowest for the top grasp. Use of the hemiparetic arm was associated with increased duration of the unloading phase and greater difficulty with maintaining the vertical orientation of the object at the transitions to object lifting and object placement. The occurrence of touch and push errors at the onset of grasp varied according to both grasp configuration and use of the hemiparetic arm.Conclusion: Stroke patients exhibit impairments in the scale and temporal precision of grip force adjustments and reduced ability to maintain object orientation with various grasp configurations using the hemiparetic arm. Nonetheless, the timing and magnitude of grip force adjustments may be facilitated using a top grasp configuration. Conversely, whole hand prehension strategies compound difficulties with grip force scaling and inhibit the synchrony of grasp onset and object release.

Highlights

  • Cerebrovascular accidents are a frequent cause of disability [1] and the recovery of upper-limb function in particular, is a key determinant of independence in activities of daily living [2]

  • We found that the frequency of touch errors was greatest when initiating a palmar-digital grasp and that this grasp configuration was associated with variable object orientation at tl

  • Stroke patients with more important impairments tend to use palmar-digital grasp configurations more consistently than less impaired stroke patients or healthy adults [53]. Whilst this behavior may assist stroke patients to compensate for reduced dexterity or muscle strength [53], the results presented here indicate that this preferential use of the palmar-digital grasping strategies may impact upon task execution in terms of grip force economy, temporal precision of grip force adjustments, and stability of the hand-held object

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cerebrovascular accidents (stroke) are a frequent cause of disability [1] and the recovery of upper-limb function in particular, is a key determinant of independence in activities of daily living [2]. The physical impairment experienced by patients is characterized by loss of strength, abnormal movement patterns (pathological synergies), and changes in muscle tone to the side of the body contralateral to the stroke [3, 4]. This presentation is commonly referred to as hemiparesis and its severity tends to reflect the extent of the lesion to the corticospinal tract [5]. Patients living with stroke find that limitations with manual dexterity of the hemiparetic arm have the most significant effect upon their ability to carry out activities involving hand use in daily life [11] These impairments in patient hand function manifest in multiple different aspects of motor performance. Atypical reaching and grasping patterns are often seen to emerge both as a consequence of and as a response to the motor dysfunction [15, 16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call