Abstract

Conversion of natural to anthropogenic environments affects biodiversity, and the understanding of these impacts may be improved by assessing how different functional groups respond to such land conversion. We studied land conversion impacts on ant functional groups, as ants are ecologically important and respond well to various environmental changes. We hypothesized that conversion of natural to anthropogenic environments modifies the composition of functional groups, fostering generalist and opportunistic groups over specialist ones, with more responses of this type in tropical than in temperate regions. We recovered 412 papers from ISI Web of Science, of which we selected 17 studies, published between 1993 and 2018, that addressed our study’s question. We assessed whether each functional group responded positively or negatively to conversion of natural habitat into anthropogenic land uses and used Monte Carlo tests to assess significance. Ants were affected by natural habitat conversion into monoculture and polyculture and by the conversion of savannas and of tropical and subtropical forests. Land conversion affected six of the 13 functional groups assessed here. In the temperate zone, cryptic species, predators, subordinate Camponotini, cold-climate specialists and tropical-climate specialists were impaired, whereas hot-climate specialists were favored. In the tropics, land conversion negatively impacted fungus-growers and predators. In both climatic zones, several functional groups, mainly those with broad ecological niches, did not respond to land conversion. Our results corroborate that land conversion effects vary among ant functional groups and indicate that the ant fauna of temperate ecosystems may be more susceptible than that of tropical regions.

Highlights

  • Human dependence on natural resources is continuously increasing and aims to meet our immediate needs for food, fiber, water, and shelter

  • Since the Industrial Revolution, there has been an intensification in land use change and habitat conversion, which has resulted in the global degradation of environmental conditions (Foley et al, 2005; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; Ellis et al, 2013)

  • Negative effects habitat conversion to monocultures and polycultures were observed, as well as a lack of effect of conversion to agroforestry and pastures. These changes were observed in both the temperate and the tropical zones, with more functional groups (FGs) affected in temperate ecosystems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human dependence on natural resources is continuously increasing and aims to meet our immediate needs for food, fiber, water, and shelter. Since the Industrial Revolution, there has been an intensification in land use change and habitat conversion (which we define here as the conversion of natural habitats into anthropogenic land uses, mainly agricultural ones), which has resulted in the global degradation of environmental conditions (Foley et al, 2005; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; Ellis et al, 2013) The effects of such land use change range from altering the structure and functioning of ecosystems to modifying the dynamics of interactions between ecosystems and atmosphere, water bodies and the surrounding lands (Vitousek et al, 1997; Foley et al, 2005). Assessing the effects of habitat conversion on biological communities helps to understand how environmental changes affect biodiversity, ecosystem functions and ecosystem services (Haines-Young, 2009; Luck et al, 2009; Geijzendorffer & Roche, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call