Abstract

Grass was ensiled using an acid-based additive (AS) or homofermentative lactic acid bacteria (IS). In addition, barley grain was either dried (DB) or crimped and ensiled (EB). The feeds were fed as total mixed rations (TMR) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement to 16 Nordic Red dairy cows in four replicated Latin squares. The differences in the fermentation quality of the two grass silages were unexpectedly small. Dry matter intake was higher (p < 0.01) for cows fed AS than those fed IS but was not affected by barley preservation method. Ruminal molar proportion of butyrate tended to be higher in cows fed AS rather than IS (p < 0.10) in expense of acetate (p < 0.05). Barley preservation method did not affect rumen fermentation but modulated rumen bacterial community composition. Milk production was not affected by silage additive but tended (p < 0.10) to be higher (39.6 vs. 39.0 kg/d) for cows fed DB rather than EB. However, barley type did not affect energy corrected milk yield due to a tendency (p < 0.10) for higher milk fat content of cows fed EB rather than DB. Milk fat yield tended (p < 0.10) to be higher for AS-fed cows than IS-fed cows, and milk protein yield was higher for cows receiving DB rather than EB. The AS resulted in more aerobically stable TMR than IS and a minor advantage was found for DB compared to EB.

Highlights

  • Seasonal feed production makes preservation of both forage and concentrate feeds necessary

  • Selected lactic acid bacteria inoculants (LAB) strains are widely available in the market and they are used to accelerate and direct the lactic acid fermentation in the silage compared to untreated material, while formic acid (FA)-based additives effectively restrict silage fermentation [2,3]

  • The fresh forages of both additive treatments were similar in dry matter (DM), ash, and crude protein (CP) concentrations, showing that no major differences in raw material between the two silages were evident

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Seasonal feed production makes preservation of both forage and concentrate feeds necessary. Application of FA to grass silage results in a silage with relatively high water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration and low lactic acid and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, the opposite being the case for silages prepared using bacterial inoculants [2,3]. When cows consume these silages, the substrates for rumen microbes differ substantially, which has been reflected in differences in rumen fermentation pattern and, subsequently, in the metabolism and milk composition of dairy cows [4,5,6]. Restriction of silage fermentation has been shown to increase the voluntary feed intake of dairy cows [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.