Abstract
Triplicated groups of six small-size (S, 70.3 g), six large-size (L, 96.3 g), and six mixed-size (S + L) fish consisting of three small [S(S + L): 67.5 g] and three large fish [L(S + L): 97.5 g] were reared for 75 days. Fish were individually marked. In all treatments, a feeding hierarchy was established; fish of the highest feeding ranks had the higher mass and specific growth rate (SGR), consumed the majority of food offered with little daily variation, and made more efforts to claim food. Correlation coefficients for S(S + L) and L fish were lower compared to S and L(S + L) fish respectively. The same was observed for the correlation coefficients between mean share of meal and coefficient of daily food consumption variation thus indicating a milder social environment for S(S + L) and L fish. S(S + L) fish had significantly higher SGR, mass gain, and condition factor than S fish. S(S + L) and L fish had a greater percentage of fish consuming the ideal amount of food and obtaining satisfactory feed efficiency than S and L(S + L) fish. Present results indicate that, within the range of body mass examined, grading is beneficial for the large fish but not for the small ones. Grading effects are strongly associated with changes in the strength of social hierarchies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.