Abstract

Abstract. Recent work has quantified the delay times in measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) caused by the partitioning between the gas phase and the surfaces of the inlet tubing and instrument itself. In this study we quantify wall partitioning effects on time responses and transmission of multifunctional, semivolatile, and intermediate-volatility organic compounds (S/IVOCs) with saturation concentrations (C∗) between 100 and 104 µg m−3. The instrument delays of several chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) instruments increase with decreasing C∗, ranging from seconds to tens of minutes, except for the NO3- CIMS where it is always on the order of seconds. Six different tubing materials were tested. Teflon, including PFA, FEP, and conductive PFA, performs better than metals and Nafion in terms of both delay time and transmission efficiency. Analogous to instrument responses, tubing delays increase as C∗ decreases, from less than a minute to >100 min. The delays caused by Teflon tubing vs. C∗ can be modeled using the simple chromatography model of Pagonis et al. (2017). The model can be used to estimate the equivalent absorbing mass concentration (Cw) of each material, and to estimate delays under different flow rates and tubing dimensions. We also include time delay measurements from a series of small polar organic and inorganic analytes in PFA tubing measured by CIMS. Small polar molecules behave differently than larger organic ones, with their delays being predicted by their Henry's law constants instead of their C∗, suggesting the dominance of partitioning to small amounts of water on sampling surfaces as a result of their polarity and acidity properties. PFA tubing has the best performance for gas-only sampling, while conductive PFA appears very promising for sampling S/IVOCs and particles simultaneously. The observed delays and low transmission both affect the quality of gas quantification, especially when no direct calibration is available. Improvements in sampling and instrument response are needed for fast atmospheric measurements of a wide range of S/IVOCs (e.g., by aircraft or for eddy covariance). These methods and results are also useful for more general characterization of surface–gas interactions.

Highlights

  • Tubing that transports air from the ambient atmosphere or laboratory experiments to a detector can perturb the concentrations of gaseous analytes in the air by gas–wall interactions, and presents a challenge to accurate quantification

  • Double or triple exponential decays were observed for other chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) used in this work for the same set of semivolatile compounds, consistent with prior results for a Vocus proton-transfer time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Vocus PTR-ToF) for more volatile ketones (C∗ 104– 107 μg m−3) (Krechmer et al, 2018)

  • The instrument and tubing delays of S/intermediate-volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) with saturation concentration between 100 and 104 μg m−3 were characterized, which are useful for the design of improved inlets and instruments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tubing that transports air from the ambient atmosphere or laboratory experiments to a detector can perturb the concentrations of gaseous analytes in the air by gas–wall interactions, and presents a challenge to accurate quantification. This study extends the systematic and quantitative characterization of tubing and instrument delay times to SVOCs and to lower-volatility IVOCs (100 to 104 μg m−3) using CIMS coupled with an I− source. These semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) were rapidly generated through photochemistry in a Teflon chamber. Faster quantification of semivolatile species by informing inlet material selection and instrumental design, and provide a useful method to quantitatively characterize any gas– surface interactions

Experimental
Experiments with small organic and inorganic molecules
Delay quantification
Instrument response
Teflon tubing delays for semivolatile compounds
Stainless-steel and Silonite tubing delays for semivolatile compounds
Tubing delays for small polar compounds in Teflon tubing and instruments
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call