Abstract

The estimation of total hydrocarbons (HCs) in place is one of the most important economic challenges in unconventional resource plays. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has proven to be a valuable tool in directly quantifying both hydrocarbons and brines in the laboratory and the field. Some major applications of NMR interpretation include pore body size distributions, wettability, fluid types, and fluid properties. However, for tight formations, the effects of the factors on NMR relaxation data are intertwined. One purpose of this study is to review the interpretation of NMR response of HCs in a tight rock matrix through illustrated examples. When comparing NMR data between downhole wireline and laboratory measurement, three important elements need to be considered: 1) temperature differences, 2) system response differences, and 3) pressure (mainly due to the lost gasses.) The effect of temperature on HCs would be presented with experimental results for bulk fluids. Whereas, the effect of pressure is investigated by injecting gas back into rock matrix saturated with original fluids. The experiments were performed within an NMR transparent Daedalus ZrO2 pressure cell, which operates at pressures up to 10,000 psi. The results show that, at ambient temperature and pressure, NMR responds to a fraction of HCs, which is volatile enough to be observed as an NMR relaxation sequence. The invisible fraction of HCs to NMR sequence at ambient condition can be up to 20% of the total extractable HCs. Molecular relaxation is impacted by fluid viscosity, pore size, and surface affinity. In other words, the fluid with higher viscosity (either due to temperature or gas loss), presenting in smaller pore, or highly affected by the pore surface, will relax faster, and would be partially invisible to NMR, especially in the field. This is critical to the interpretation of NMR response for liquid rich source rocks, in which all of the above molecular relaxing restrictions can be found. Thus, engineers can underestimate movable HCs by using routine core analysis data.

Highlights

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) has been proven to be a useful tool to evaluate formation characteristics in both the laboratory and the field

  • Routine petrophysical characterizations were performed and presented in Table. 1, including total porosity, mineralogy measured by transmission Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR), and TOC measured with a LECO® instrument

  • We investigate the effect of gas pressurization by injecting gas into a rock matrix saturated with original fluids

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) has been proven to be a useful tool to evaluate formation characteristics in both the laboratory and the field. Developed applications of NMR, focusing on unconventional tight rocks, include the partitioning of pore surface affinity (oil-wet versus water-wet in shales) (Odusina et al, 2011[9]; Valori and Nicot, 2019[10]) and the characterization of in situ fluids. 2017[12] demonstrated how the differences in NMR configuration (such as scanning frequency, echo spacing, signal to noise ratio, and magnetic field gradient) can make the comparison between laboratory and field data complicated. Another major concern for almost all laboratory versus log comparison studies is the core condition, even for preserved samples (Blount et al, 2018[13]). We will review the understanding of NMR response to HCs in bulk fluids as a function of temperature (Dang et al, 2019[14]), as well as the new insights on how gas pressurization/ depressurization influences NMR response on organic rich tight rocks

Experimental instrument and samples
Measureable fractions of HCs under NMR spectroscopy
Impact of gas pressurization or depressurization on NMR response
Application to study huff-n-puff in shales
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call