Abstract
Objectives To assess different flooring surfaces currently used in sheltered housing, and to record differences in foot pressures using the Musgrave Medical Underplantar Pressure Technology System. Design Experimental repeated measures design. Participants Ten female volunteer subjects (mean age 78.3 years). Interventions A total of 12 different flooring surfaces were tested and pressure recordings obtained in standardised footwear. Main outcome measures Heel strike, toe off, time between heel strike and toe off, contact area and maximum load were recorded. Results Important differences in the outcome variables were noted between the surfaces with the most favourable pattern occurring with heavy duty carpet without underlay, with a mean heel strike of 2.1 scans [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 2.6], a mean toe off of 1.5 scans (95% CI 1.0 to 1.9) and a short mean interval from heel strike to toe off of 1004 milliseconds (95% CI 871 to 1137). This can be compared with a less favourable surface, a bedroom pile with underlay for example, which recorded a mean heel strike of 6.0 scans (95% CI 5.0 to 7.0) with a mean toe off of 7.5 scans (95% CI 5.6 to 9.3) and a mean interval from heel strike to toe off of 1034 milliseconds (95% CI 924 to 1143). Conclusion Floor surfaces have an important influence on gait and are likely to affect walking stability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.