Abstract

We report the case of an 11-year-old boy with autism who displayed aggressive behavior and required aggression-contingent physical restraint (protective holding) to protect peers and teachers from injury. During a baseline phase, teachers implemented the boy’s behavior support plan and applied protective holding according to a behavior-contingent release (BCR) criterion in which they maintained physical contact with him until he was “calm” for a minimum of 30 consecutive seconds. In the intervention phase, baseline procedures remained in effect, but the teachers terminated protective holding with the boy according to a fixed-time release (FTR) criterion that was independent of his behavior during protective holding and faded (decreased) systematically over time. In contrast to BCR, FTR fading was associated with less exposure to and fewer applications of protective holding. Post-intervention and follow-up results revealed that protective holding was no longer required. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.