Abstract
We examined fecal glucocorticoid (fGC) measures of nutrition and thermoregulatory demands on wild bears in Glacier National Park, Montana, and assessed how these measures changed in samples left in the field. Both ambient temperature and exposure can impact thermoregulation and sample degradation. Bear diets vary markedly with season, affecting body condition and thus fGC. We collected fecal samples during September and October, 2001, when ambient temperatures ranged from 30°C to −5°C. We collected half of each sample immediately and left the other half in its original location for 1–28 days. We used generalized linear models (GLM) to first predict fGC concentrations in fresh samples based on proxies of nutrition, ambient temperature, thermal exposure, and precipitation. These same covariates were then used to predict degradation-based differences in fGC concentrations between the paired sample halves. Variation in fGC was predicted by diet, Julian date, aspect, and the interaction between Julian date and aspect in both fresh and exposed samples. Cumulative precipitation was also a significant predictor of fGC concentrations in the exposed samples, independent of time, indicating that precipitation contributes to sample degradation but not enough to mask effects of other environmental factors on fGC concentrations. Differences between sample halves were only predicted by cumulative precipitation and exposure time; cumulative precipitation decreased, whereas exposure time increased, fGC concentrations in the exposed sample halves. Results indicate that fGC can provide reliable indices of nutrition and thermoregulatory demands in bears and that sample degradation impacts on these relations are minimal and can be virtually eliminated by controlling for cumulative precipitation over the estimated exposure times.
Highlights
Fecal hormone analysis has become a widely used technique for measuring an animal’s endocrine status and can provide valuable information to conservation and monitoring programs
We ask: can we detect a biological relationship between thermoregulatory demands or nutrition and Fecal glucocorticoids (fGC) concentrations in bears? How does fGC degradation change with time, temperature, and exposure?
Precipitation had no effect on fGC concentrations in the time 0 samples, supporting our assumption that degradation effects were undetectable in the time 0 samples (Table 1)
Summary
Fecal hormone analysis has become a widely used technique for measuring an animal’s endocrine status and can provide valuable information to conservation and monitoring programs. Noninvasive physiological measures of thermoregulatory demands and associated impacts from habitat shifts in wildlife over large landscapes could provide a sensitive tool for early detection and monitoring of such impacts. Fecal glucocorticoids (fGC: cortisol, corticosterone, and their metabolites) could provide one such measure, having been shown to reflect physiological responses to ambient temperature and thermal exposure in mammals [13,14]. Monitoring these impacts in nature can be difficult, because warmer ambient temperatures and environmental exposure may hasten fGC degradation, and both temperature and exposure effects are likely to vary with time of year [15]. We ask: can we detect a biological relationship between thermoregulatory demands or nutrition and fGC concentrations in bears? How does fGC degradation change with time, temperature, and exposure?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.