Abstract

Strenuous exercise has been reported to affect various aspects of visual and ocular function. In the first of two experiments, the effects of cycling, jogging and stair running on a range of visual functions were examined. None of these forms of exercise was found to have any significant effect on visual acuity, refractive error, dark focus, amplitude of accommodation or pupil size. Contrast sensitivity (CS), measured by an ascending method of limits (AML), was found to improve significantly after cycling and jogging but not after stair running. To investigate if the apparent improvement in CS was related to a change in ‘sensitivity’ or a change in decision criteria, CS was re-measured before and after cycling using both the AML and a ‘criterion-free’ method of constant stimuli (MOCS) procedure. Results obtained using the AML, confirmed the findings of the first experiment. However, results obtained using the MOCS procedure showed no significant change with exercise. This suggests that the improvement in CS found using the AML was due to a shift in subjects' decision criteria rather than a physiological change in ‘sensitivity’. It is argued that this change in decision criteria may be related to the positive mood changes which have been found to occur after exercise. This study demonstrates the importance of differentiating between changes in ‘sensitivity’ and changes in decision criteria especially where mood or motivation (and hence decision criteria) may be confounded with the independent variable. This is particularly important when evaluating the effects of exercise on visual function or evaluating the efficacy of vision training.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call