Abstract

A positive influence of international collaboration on the impact of research has been previously extensively described. This paper takes a step further by providing an investigation of the effects of funding sources on Estonian research impact based on Thomson Reuters` citation indexes. We ask whether also European Union (EU) funding in addition to international collaboration help Estonia achieve a higher scientific impact. The present paper uses funding acknowledgement (FA) section included in Web of Science (WoS) for determining sources of funding. For this purpose, articles with Estonia in the address section are selected and retrieved from 2008 to 2015 and are divided into four categories based on their funding sources; national; EU; national and EU simultaneously; and other. Results show that EU funding increases Estonian scientific impact significantly. Although there is some variability between research areas, EU funding combined with international collaboration produces the most cited scientific articles. It suggests that EU funding can help Estonia get a better outcome in international collaboration than otherwise possible. The main limitations of this paper include methodical problems how funding agencies are determined in WoS and the time dependence of citations what makes an evaluation of recent publications robust.

Highlights

  • The ability to estimate a nation’s scientific impact is vital for managers who have to make decisions about funding and set research priorities

  • The main limitations of this paper include methodical problems how funding agencies are determined in Web of Science (WoS) and the time dependence of citations what makes an evaluation of recent publications robust

  • The results show that a combination of European Union (EU) funding and international collaboration produces the most cited scientific articles. These results suggest that regarding scientific impact, the EU can help Estonian scientists get a better outcome in international collaboration than otherwise possible

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to estimate a nation’s scientific impact is vital for managers who have to make decisions about funding and set research priorities. In the context of this paper, we measure scientific impact in terms of citations. Eugenie Garfield, the pioneer of scientometrics states[2] that the total number of citations is about the most objective measure there is of the materials importance to current research. One uncovered topic is the effects of EU funding on countries scientific impact. Estonia has been one of the most active participants in EU funding[4] and has increased its scientific impact in terms of citations per paper by 54 per cent during 2007–2014.[5] it is important to ask how much of this increase was due to EU funding

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call