Effects of endometrial versus non-endometrial suturing on isthmocele development; a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

ObjectiveIncomplete healing after cesarean section (CS) can result in isthmocele formation. When suturing the uterus, fully folding the wound lips may embed the endometrial layer into the myometrium, leading to isthmocele development. Hence, this study aimed to compare the effects of endometrial and non-endometrial suturing on isthmocele development. Material and methodsThis randomized controlled trial included 274 patients. Women who underwent primary CS were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups: endometrial suturing and non-endometrial suturing. The primary outcome was isthmocele rate at postpartum 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the volume of the isthmocele, thickness of the residual myometrium, menstrual irregularities (intermenstrual spotting), and the relationship between the isthmocele and uterine position. ResultsA total of 159 patients (81 in the endometrial suturing group and 78 in the non-endometrial suturing group) were analyzed. The incidence of isthmocele was significantly lower in the non-endometrial suturing group than in the endometrial suturing group (12 [15.4%] vs. 24 [29.6%] patients; p = 0.032). Menstrual irregularities, such as intermenstrual spotting, were significantly higher in the endometrial suturing group than in the non-endometrial group (p = 0.019). ConclusionUterine closure with non-endometrial suturing was associated with significantly lower isthmocele development and less intermenstrual spotting compared to that with endometrial suturing.