Abstract
Sickness presence can have important individual and organizational consequences, such as health deterioration or productivity loss. Additional risks, such as negative customer reactions, may be particularly relevant in the service sector. Based on affective events theory and appraisal theories, we hypothesize that employee sickness presence negatively impacts customer repurchase and recommendation intentions. Furthermore, we explore potential affective mechanisms of these effects, including disease avoidance, personal anger, moral outrage, post-consumption guilt, and customer compassion for the employee. We conducted four studies, including three experimental vignette methodology studies (Ns = 227, 72, and 763) and a qualitative study (N = 54). In Study 1, employee sickness presence had negative effects on repurchase and recommendation intentions. Results of Study 2 show that customers experienced disgust, fear, anger, guilt, compassion, and indifference in response to sickness presence. In Study 3, anger explained the negative effects of employee sickness presence on repurchase and recommendation intentions, while appraisals of moral fairness were negatively related to both customer intentions. Finally, in Study 4, disgust and anger explained negative effects, while fear, guilt, and compassion explained positive effects of employee sickness presence on customer intentions. Appraisals of goal incongruence, reduced agency of the customer, and uncertainty were negatively related to customer intentions. The physical absence of the customer in the service encounter (phone call) mitigated the experience of disgust, fear, and anger, whereas it exacerbated feelings of compassion for the ill employee.
Highlights
Sickness presence, defined as working while being ill, has earned much interest due to its detrimental effects on employee health and performance (Lohaus & Habermann, 2019) and the related negative organizational consequences (Hemp, 2004; Schultz et al, 2009)
Repurchase and recommendation intentions were rated higher in Scenario 1a without a cue of employee sickness presence (M = 4.11, SD = 0.96 for repurchase; M = 3.99, SD = 1.01 for recommendation) than in Scenario 1b, which included such a cue (M = 3.52, SD = 1.18 for repurchase; M = 3.49, SD = 1.21 for recommendation). These results support our assumption that employee sickness presence has negative effects on customer repurchase and recommendation intentions (Hypothesis 1a and 1b; for an overview of the results, see Table 2)
In line with Hypotheses 1a and 1b, we replicated the negative effects of employee sickness presence on customer repurchase intention and recommendation intention (Table S8) that were found in Study 1
Summary
Sickness presence, defined as working while being ill, has earned much interest due to its detrimental effects on employee health and performance (Lohaus & Habermann, 2019) and the related negative organizational consequences (Hemp, 2004; Schultz et al, 2009). The affective reactions are quantitatively examined as potential mechanisms of effects of employee sickness presence on customer repurchase and recommendation intentions in Study 3 (see Fig. 1). To this end, we use another experimental vignette methodology study with a scenario that describes the delivery of a parcel. We conceive employee sickness presence as an affective event for customers, who subsequently show various cognitive reactions (i.e., appraisals) and affective reactions (i.e., emotions) These reactions may reflect evolutionary or social mechanisms, such as disease avoidance, and could influence customers’ intentions. We summarize and discuss the results of all four studies
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.