Abstract

Charge balanced pulses are used in modern cochlear implants to avoid direct current (DC) stimulation that may damage neural tissues. In this context the effect of electrical pulse shape and polarity is still a matter of debate and the most effective pulse shape needs to be determined (Bahmer et al., 2010a; Undurraga et al., 2010; Wieringen et al., 2008; Macherey et al., 2008). Therefore, we conducted electrophysiological measurements, namely electrical compound action potentials (ECAPs) to assess response strength elicited by various pulse shapes and polarities in five cochlear implant recipients (SonataTI100/PulsarCI100 devices, MED-EL Innsbruck). ECAP response strength depending on pulse shape was compared with individual psychophysical thresholds. Results indicated the weakest response amplitude and highest thresholds for symmetric triphasic pulse shapes (with cathodic second phase), and the strongest response amplitude and lowest thresholds for biphasic pulses with anodic first phase. Biphasic pulses with cathodic first phase generated intermediate response amplitude and thresholds.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call