Abstract
Abstract. To achieve the Paris Agreement requires aggressive mitigation strategies alongside negative emission technologies. Recent studies suggest that increasing tree cover can make a substantial contribution to negative emissions, with the tropics being the most suitable region from a biogeophysical perspective. Yet these studies typically do not account for subsequent carbon cycle and climate responses to large-scale land-use change. Here we quantify the maximum potential temperature and CO2 benefits from pantropical forest restoration, including the Earth system response, using a fully coupled, emission-driven Earth system model (HadGEM2-ES). We perform an idealised experiment where all land use in the tropics is stopped and vegetation is allowed to recover, on top of an aggressive mitigation scenario (RCP2.6). We find that tropical restoration of 1529 Mha increases carbon stored in live biomass by 130 Pg C by 2100 CE. Whilst avoiding deforestation and tropical restoration in the tropics removes 42 Pg C compared to RCP2.6, the subsequent reduction in extratropical and ocean carbon uptake means that carbon in the atmosphere only reduces by 18 Pg C by 2100. The resulting small CO2 (9 ppm) benefit does not translate to a detectable reduction in global surface air temperature compared to the control experiment. The greatest carbon benefit is achieved 30–50 years after restoration before the Earth system response adjusts to the new land-use regime and declining fossil fuel use. Comparing our results with previous modelling studies, we identify two model-independent key points: (i) in a world where emission reductions follow the Paris Agreement, restoration is best deployed immediately, and (ii) the global carbon cycle response to reduced emissions limits the efficacy of negative emissions technologies by more than half. We conclude that forest restoration can reduce peak CO2 mid-century, but it can only modestly contribute to negative emissions.
Highlights
A limited quantity of additional carbon can be added to the atmosphere before temperatures exceed the threshold of 2 ◦C above the pre-industrial levels specified in the Paris Agreement on climate change (Allen et al, 2009; United Nations Treaty Collection, 2016)
In the control simulation, broadleaf forest declined globally by 107 Mha from 2006–2100 CE, driven by a decline of 213 Mha in the tropics that is somewhat offset by an 106 Mha increase in the extratropics
The largest differences between esmrcp26 and esmrcp26restor in all five plant functional type (PFT) used in the model (Cox, 2001) are located in the tropics (Table A1)
Summary
A limited quantity of additional carbon can be added to the atmosphere before temperatures exceed the threshold of 2 ◦C above the pre-industrial levels specified in the Paris Agreement on climate change (Allen et al, 2009; United Nations Treaty Collection, 2016). Increasing the land carbon sink via natural climate solutions, such as forest restoration, in the tropics, is often seen as a low-cost alternative to carbon capture and storage technologies or at least as a bridge until these negative emissions technologies are widely available (Griscom et al, 2017; Busch et al, 2019). There is much uncertainty and controversy over the role of large-scale forest restoration in sequestering carbon, which is often because the carbon cycle and energy balance responses of the Earth system to widespread land-use change are not considered
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
