Abstract

Accurate estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) in arid ecosystems are important for sustainable water resource management due to competing water demands between human and ecological environments. Several empirical remotely sensed ET models have been constructed and their potential for regional scale ET estimation in arid ecosystems has been demonstrated. Generally, these models were built using combined measured ET and corresponding remotely sensed and meteorological data from diverse sites. However, there are usually different vegetation types or mixed vegetation types in these sites, and little information is available on the estimation uncertainty of these models induced by combining different vegetation types from diverse sites. In this study, we employed the most popular one of these models and recalibrated it using datasets from two typical vegetation types (shrub Tamarix ramosissima and arbor Populus euphratica) in arid ecosystems of northwestern China. The recalibration was performed in the following two ways: using combined datasets from the two vegetation types, and using a single dataset from specific vegetation type. By comparing the performance of the two methods in ET estimation for Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica, we investigated and compared the accuracy of ET estimation at the site scale and the difference in annual ET estimation at the regional scale. The results showed that the estimation accuracy of daily, monthly, and yearly ET was improved by distinguishing the vegetation types. The method based on the combined vegetation types had a great influence on the estimation accuracy of annual ET, which overestimated annual ET about 9.19% for Tamarix ramosissima and underestimated annual ET about 11.50% for Populus euphratica. Furthermore, substantial difference in annual ET estimation at regional scale was found between the two methods. The higher the vegetation coverage, the greater the difference in annual ET. Our results provide valuable information on evaluating the estimation accuracy of regional scale ET using empirical remotely sensed ET models for arid ecosystems.

Highlights

  • Evapotranspiration (ET) is the water transferred from land surfaces to the atmosphere through surface evaporation and plant transpiration [1]

  • The estimation method based on specific vegetation type proposed in this study is feasible in practical applications

  • In this study, using the Nagler model [11] and the datasets from two typical vegetation types (Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica) in arid ecosystems of northwestern China, we investigated the effects of distinguishing vegetation types on the estimates of remotely sensed ET at site and regional scales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evapotranspiration (ET) is the water transferred from land surfaces to the atmosphere through surface evaporation and plant transpiration [1]. Some empirical remotely sensed ET models have been developed [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] and their potential for regional scale ET estimation in arid ecosystems has been demonstrated [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. It is necessary to evaluate and quantify the estimation uncertainty of these empirical remotely sensed ET models at site and regional scales

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.