Abstract
To find out if the use of different virtual monoenergetic data sets enabled by DECT technology might have a negative impact on post-processing applications, specifically in case of the "unfolded ribs" algorithm. Metal or beam hardening artifacts are suspected to generate image artifacts and thus reduce diagnostic accuracy. This paper tries to find out how the generation of "unfolded rib" CT image reformates is influenced by different virtual monoenergetic CT images and looks for possible improvement of the post-processing tool. Between March 2021 and April 2021, thin-slice dual-energy CT image data of the chest were used creating "unfolded rib" reformates. The same data sets were analyzed in three steps: first the gold standard with the original algorithm on mixed image data sets followed by the original algorithm on different keV levels (40-120keV) and finally using a modified algorithm which in the first step used segmentation based on mixed image data sets, followed by segmentation based on different keV levels. Image quality (presence of artifacts), lesion and fracture detectability were assessed for all series. Both, the original and the modified algorithm resulted in more artifact-free image data sets compared to the gold standard. The modified algorithm resulted in significantly more artifact-free image data sets at the keV-edges (40-120keV) compared the original algorithm. Especially "black artifacts" and pseudo-lesions, potentially inducing false positive findings, could be reduced in all keV level with the modified algorithm. Detection of focal sclerotic, lytic or mixed (k = 0.990-1.000) lesions was very good for all keV levels. The Fleiss-kappa test for detection of fresh and old rib fractures was ≥ 0.997. The use of different virtual monoenergetic keVs for the "unfolded rib" algorithm is generating different artifacts. Segmentation-based artifacts could be eliminated by the proposed new algorithm, showing the best results at 70-80keV.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.