Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains

Işil Sarikaya,Ahmet Umut Güler

doi:10.1590/s1678-77572010000100004

Işil Sarikaya, Ahmet Umut Güler

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572010000100004

Copy DOI

Abstract

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains.Material and MethodsFifty-five cylindirical specimens (15x2 mm) were prepared for each feldspathic (Vita VMK 95, Ceramco III) and low-fusing dental porcelain (Matchmaker). Fifty-five specimens of machinable feldspathic porcelain blocks (Vitablocs Mark II), (12x14x18 mm) were cut into 2-mm-thick slices (12x14 mm) with low speed saw. The prepared specimens were divided into 11 groups (n=5) representing different polishing techniques including control ((C) no surface treatment), glaze (G) and other 9 groups that were finished and polished with polishing discs (Sof-Lex) (Sl), two porcelain polishing kits (NTI (Pk), Dialite II (Di)), a diamond polishing paste (Sparkle) (Sp), a zirconium silicate based cleaning and polishing prophy paste (Zircate) (Zr), an aluminum oxide polishing paste (Prisma Gloss) (Pg), and combinations of them. The surface roughness of all groups was measured with a profilometer. The data were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance, and the mean values were compared by the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test (α=0.05).ResultsFor all porcelain material groups, the lowest Ra values were observed in Group Gl, Group Sl, Group Pk, and Group Di, which were not significantly different from each other (p>0.05).When comparing the 4 different porcelain materials, the machinable feldspathic porcelain block group (Mark II) demonstrated statistically significantly less Ra values than the other porcelain materials tested (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the VMK 95 and Ceramco III porcelain groups (p=0.919), also these groups demonstrated the highest Ra values.ConclusionSubjected to surface roughness, the surfaces obtained with polishing and/or cleaning-prophy paste materials used alone were rougher compared to the surfaces finished using Sof-lex, Dialite, and NTI polishing kit. Polishing kits and discs were found more effective than the polishing pastes used alone or combined use with Sof-lex discs, thus improving surface smoothness.

Highlights

In addition to the improved esthetic properties, such as translucency, color and intensity, the main advantages of dental porcelain materials are excellent biocompatibility and durability[3]. occlusal adjustment of porcelain restorations may be necessary for correction of inadequate contours or improved esthetics, roughened ceramic surface creating with this procedure, which may cause an increased rate of plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation and adverse soft tissue reaction . 1,10,20,24 In addition porcelain reduction with grinding may cause decrease the strength of the ceramic restoration[4,12,14].Since the final occlusal adjustments of a ceramic restoration has to be made after cementation, there is always need for a carefulJ Appl Oral Sci. 10 2010;18(1):[10-6]intraoral polishing of the surfaces
Occlusal adjustment of porcelain restorations may be necessary for correction of inadequate contours or improved esthetics, roughened ceramic surface creating with this procedure, which may cause an increased rate of plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation and adverse soft tissue reaction . 1,10,20,24 In addition porcelain reduction with grinding may cause decrease the strength of the ceramic restoration[4,12,14]
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of different dental porcelains

Summary

Introduction

In addition to the improved esthetic properties, such as translucency, color and intensity, the main advantages of dental porcelain materials are excellent biocompatibility and durability[3]. occlusal adjustment of porcelain restorations may be necessary for correction of inadequate contours or improved esthetics, roughened ceramic surface creating with this procedure, which may cause an increased rate of plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation and adverse soft tissue reaction . 1,10,20,24 In addition porcelain reduction with grinding may cause decrease the strength of the ceramic restoration[4,12,14].Since the final occlusal adjustments of a ceramic restoration has to be made after cementation, there is always need for a carefulJ Appl Oral Sci. 10 2010;18(1):[10-6]intraoral polishing of the surfaces. In addition to the improved esthetic properties, such as translucency, color and intensity, the main advantages of dental porcelain materials are excellent biocompatibility and durability[3]. Occlusal adjustment of porcelain restorations may be necessary for correction of inadequate contours or improved esthetics, roughened ceramic surface creating with this procedure, which may cause an increased rate of plaque accumulation, gingival inflammation and adverse soft tissue reaction . 1,10,20,24 In addition porcelain reduction with grinding may cause decrease the strength of the ceramic restoration[4,12,14]. Polished porcelain surfaces have strength values comparable to those of specimens that were polished and glazed[3]. Chairside porcelain polishing is efficient and easy for the clinician. Intraoral polishing provides infection control by eliminating repeated laboratory procedures

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion