Abstract

Background and aim: As a result, an ongoing study is required to determine the effect of different polishing methods on the color stability of feldspathic porcelain surfaces exposed to four staining solutions at different time intervals in order to determine the most appropriate polishing method that results in better color stability for long periods, which was the goal of this study. Material and methods: This in-vitro study included 80 disc-shaped feldspathic porcelain specimens which were self-fabricated, all the specimens were auto glazed to close any pores, then randomly divided into 4 equal groups of 20 specimens. Specimens of the unpolished group (control group) underwent a removal of their glaze layer, another group was untreated (auto glazed), whereas the other two groups were prepared based on two polishing systems (over-glazed and polished). Specimens of each group (n=20) were divided into 4 groups (n=5) to be immersed in 4 staining solutions (distilled water as a control group, prepared khat extract, prepared red tea, Delsi soft drink). The color measurement of each specimen was assessed before immersion and after 1, 7 and 14 days of immersion. Results: The interaction between unpolished porcelain surfaces and khat extract or red tea showed significant higher increase in color change over time (p<0.05), whereas their interaction with Pepsi or distilled water showed no significant differences (p> 0.05). The interaction between over glazed or auto glazed porcelain surfaces and each stain showed no significant differences over time (p>0.05). Conclusion: Time plays an important role in the discoloration of feldspathic porcelain. Khat has the highest staining ability followed by red tea; however, Pepsi has the lowest staining ability due to the lack of colorant. Over glazed and auto glazed groups showed better prolonged color stability of porcelain surfaces than the polished group; however, the polishing method can be an effective and more preferable alternative as it has acceptable ∆E values and is free from the limitations of glazing methods. Peer Review History: Received: 17 June 2023; Revised: 19 July; Accepted: 28 August, Available online: 15 September 2023 Academic Editor: Dr. DANIYAN Oluwatoyin Michael, Obafemi Awolowo University, ILE-IFE, Nigeria, toyinpharm@gmail.com Received file: Reviewer's Comments: Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.5/10 Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 7.0/10 Reviewers: Dr. Sheikh Abdul Khaliq, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan, drsheikh1974@gmail.com Dr. Bilge Ahsen KARA, Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Hospital, Turkey, ahsndkyc@gmail.com

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.