Abstract

BackgroundPlasma expanders are widely used for acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH). However, existing studies have not focused on large-volume infusion with colloidal plasma expanders, and there is a lack of studies that compare the effects of different plasma expanders.MethodsThe viscosity, hydrodynamic radius (Rh) and colloid osmotic pressure (COP) of plasma expanders were determined by a cone-plate viscometer, Zetasizer and cut-off membrane, respectively. Sixty male rats were randomized into five groups with Gelofusine (Gel), Hydroxyethyl Starch 200/0.5 (HES200), Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 (HES130), Hydroxyethyl Starch 40 (HES40), and Dextran40 (Dex40), with 12 rats used in each group to build the ANH model. ANH was performed by the withdrawal of blood and simultaneous infusion of plasma expanders. Acid-base, lactate, blood gas and physiological parameters were detected.ResultsGel had a lower intrinsic viscosity than HES200 and HES130 (P < 0.01), but at a low shear rate in a mixture of colloids, red cells and plasma, Gel had a higher viscosity (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01, respectively). For hydroxyethyl starch plasma expanders, the COP at a certain concentration decreases from 11.1 mmHg to 6.1 mmHg with the increase of Rh from 10.7 nm to 20.2 nm. A severe ANH model, with the hematocrit of 40% of the baseline level, was established and accompanied by disturbances in acid-base, lactate and blood gas parameters. At the end of ANH and 60 min afterward, the Dex40 group showed a worse outcome in maintaining the acid-base balance and systemic oxygenation compared to the other groups. The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased significantly in all groups at the end of ANH. The DBP and MAP in the Dex40 group further decreased 60 min after the end of ANH. During the process of ANH, the Dex40 group showed a drop and recovery in SBP, DBP and MAP. The DBP and MAP in the HES200 group were significantly higher than those in the other groups at some time points (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01).ConclusionGel had a low intrinsic viscosity but may increase the whole blood viscosity at low shear rates. Rh and COP showed a strong correlation among hydroxyethyl starch plasma expanders. Dex40 showed a worse outcome in maintaining the acid-base balance and systemic oxygenation compared to the other plasma expanders. During the process of ANH, Dex40 displayed a V-shaped recovery pattern for blood pressure, and HES200 had the advantage in sustaining the DBP and MAP at some time points.

Highlights

  • Plasma expanders are widely used for acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH)

  • Dex40 showed a worse outcome in maintaining the acid-base balance and systemic oxygenation compared to the other plasma expanders

  • During the process of ANH, Dex40 displayed a V-shaped recovery pattern for blood pressure, and Hydroxyethyl Starch 200/0.5 (HES200) had the advantage in sustaining the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at some time points

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plasma expanders are widely used for acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH). existing studies have not focused on large-volume infusion with colloidal plasma expanders, and there is a lack of studies that compare the effects of different plasma expanders. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is performed ahead of a procedure with a high risk of blood loss [1]. During ANH, whole blood from the patient is removed and replaced with a mixture of crystalloids and colloids to maintain the blood volume [1, 2]. ANH is widely applied for patients coming through cardiac surgery, for those who refuse transfusion for religious or other reasons [3]. ANH shows great prospects in patients coming through major hepatic surgery and other procedures associated with moderate-to-high blood loss (at least 1000 ml) [4]. ANH is an effective and safe way to reduce the need for perioperative transfusion in pediatric patients receiving high bloodloss surgeries [5]. ANH is regarded as an important clinical strategy for decreasing the use of allogeneic blood [7] and has been approved as a standard method of intraoperative blood conservation by the American Society of Anesthesiologists [3, 7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call