Abstract

BackgroundHydroxyapatite (HA) is the main mineral component of the tooth structure, which exhibits considerable biological behavior and its incorporation might improve microhardness of dental materials. Microhardness of restorative materials, like glass-ionomer, is critical for the clinical longevity of restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of two glass-ionomers types by incorporating different percentages of microhydroxyapatite.Material and MethodsIn this study, 80 disc-shaped experimental specimens (6 mm in diameter, 2 mm in height) were prepared in 8 groups, including resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI, GC, Gold Label, Japan), zirconia-reinforced glass-ionomer (Zirconomer, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan), and their mixture with 0, 5, 15 and 25 wt% of microhydroxyapatite (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). All the specimens were stored in deionized water at 37ºC for 24 hours. Then Vickers microhardness test was carried out on the both sides of specimens and data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and paired t-test (P<0.05).ResultsMicrohardness of Zirconomer and RMGI increased significantly due to adding 5 and 15 wt% of micrhydrox-yapatite (P<0.001). The highest Vickers hardness number (VHN) was recorded in the RMGI group with 5 wt% of microhydroxyapatite. In addition, in all the study groups RMGI exhibited higher microhardness values than Zirconomer (P<0.001). However, microhardness values decreased significantly after adding 25 wt% of microhydroxyapatite to Zirconomer (P<0.001). Similarly, VHN decreased in RMGI groups containing 25 wt% of HA compared to control groups (without HA) (P<0.001).ConclusionsIncorporation of 5 and 15 wt% of microhydroxyapatite to RMGI and Zirconomer improved microhardness, while adding 25 wt% of HA decreased hardness with both experimental materials compared to the control groups (without HA). Key words:Microhardness, Resin-modified glass-ionomer, Zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer, Microhydroxyapatite.

Highlights

  • Glass-ionomer cements (GICs) are used in clinical dentistry as commercial materials since the early 1970s [1,2]

  • Two-way ANOVA showed that the interaction between microhydroxyapatite, Resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) and Zirconomer was statistically significant (P

  • These results indicated that microhardness of Zirconomer and RMGI increased significantly due to incorporation of 5 wt% of microhydroxyapatite (P

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Glass-ionomer cements (GICs) are used in clinical dentistry as commercial materials since the early 1970s [1,2]. Minimal microleakage as a result of low coefficient of thermal expansion similar to the tooth structure is one of the important advantages of glass-ionomers [5,6] Despite these advantages, the clinical use of glass-ionomers was limited due to its certain demerits such as low mechanical properties, lack of strength and toughness, short working time, low resistance to wear and early susceptibility to moisture contamination [2,7]. Conclusions: Incorporation of 5 and 15 wt% of microhydroxyapatite to RMGI and Zirconomer improved microhard-ness, while adding 25 wt% of HA decreased hardness with both experimental materials compared to the control groups (without HA)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call