Abstract
Three numerical methods, including element instantaneous failure, continuum damage mechanics, and extended finite element methods, are mainly used to simulate the fracture in cortical bone structure. Although many simulations focus on the cortical bone fracture, few have investigated the differences in prediction accuracy among the three numerical methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prediction accuracy and applicability of the three numerical methods in simulating cortical bone fracture under bending load. The rat femur samples were first used to perform the three-point bending experiment. Then, the three numerical methods were respectively used to conduct fracture simulation on the femoral finite element models. Each result was compared with the experimental data to determine the prediction accuracy. The results showed that fracture simulation based on the continuum damage mechanics method was in better agreement with the experimental results, and observable differences in the failure processes could be seen in the same model under the three simulations due to various element failure strategies. The numerical method that was suitable for simulating cortical bone fracture under bending load was determined; meanwhile, the variations in the failure simulations were observed, and the cause of the variations in the predicted results using different numerical methods was also discussed, which may have potential to improve the prediction accuracy of cortical bone fracture.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.