Effects of different basis sets and donor‐acceptor groups on linear and second‐order nonlinear optical properties and molecular frontier orbital energies

Abstract

AbstractThe calculation of molecular hyperpolarizability, molecular frontier orbital energies of some donor‐acceptor oxadiazoles (5a–f, 8a–f, and 9a–f) have been investigated using ab initio methods and different basis sets. Ab initio optimizations were performed at the Hartree–Fock (HF) and density functional (Beckee‐3–Lee–Yang–Parr; B3LYP) levels of theory with 6‐31G basis set. The polarizability (<α>), anisotropy of polarizability (Δα), and ground‐state dipole moment (μ), first hyperpolarizability (β), and molecular frontier orbital (HOMO, highest occupied molecular orbital and LUMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) energies of 5a–f, 8a–f, and 9a–f have been calculated at the HF and B3LYP methods with 6‐31G, 6‐31G(d), 6‐31+G(d), 6‐31++G(d,p), 6‐311G, 6‐311G(d), 6‐311+G(d), and 6‐311++G(d,p) basis sets. Also, the molecular hardness (η) and electronegativity (χ) parameters have been obtained using molecular frontier orbital energies. The <α>, Δα, μ, β, HOMO, LUMO energies, η and χ parameters have been investigated as dependence on the choice of method and basis set. The variation graphics of <α>, Δα, μ, β, η, and χ parameters using HF and B3LYP methods with different basis sets are presented. We have examined the frontier molecular orbital pictures of 5a–f, 8a–f, and 9a–f using B3LYP/6‐31++G(d,p) level. The 5a–f, 8a–f, and 9a–f display significant linear, second‐order molecular nonlinearity, and molecular parameters and provide the basis for future design of efficient nonlinear optical materials having the 1,3,4‐oxadiazole core. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011