Abstract

BackgroundThe major types of commercially available gelatin hydrolysates are prepared from mammals or fish. Dietary gelatin hydrolysates from mammals were reported to improve bone mineral density (BMD) in some animal models. In contrast, there is limited study showing the effects of dietary gelatin hydrolysates from fish on BMD. The quantity and structure of peptides in the plasma after oral administration of gelatin hydrolysates depend on the gelatin source, which suggests that the biological activity of gelatin hydrolysates depend on the gelatin source. This study examined the effects of fish-derived gelatin hydrolysate (FGH) or porcine-derived gelatin hydrolysate (PGH) intake on BMD and intrinsic biomechanical properties in magnesium (Mg)-deficient rats as a model showing the decrease in both BMD and intrinsic biomechanical properties.MethodsFour-week-old male Wistar rats were assigned into four groups: a normal group was fed a normal diet (48 mg Mg/100 g diet), a Mg-deficient (MgD) group was fed a MgD diet (7 mg Mg/100 g diet), a FGH group was fed a MgD + FGH diet (5% FGH), and a PGH group was fed a MgD + PGH diet (5% PGH) for 8 weeks. At the end of the study, BMD and intrinsic biomechanical properties of the femur were measured.ResultsThe MgD group showed significantly lower Young’s modulus, an intrinsic biomechanical property, and trabecular BMD of the femur than the normal group; however, the MgD diet did not affect cortical BMD and cortical thickness. Both the FGH and the PGH groups showed significantly higher cortical thickness and ultimate displacement of the femur than the normal group, but neither type of gelatin hydrolysate affected Young’s modulus. Furthermore, the FGH group, but not the PGH group, showed significantly higher trabecular BMD than the MgD group.ConclusionsThis study indicates that FGH and PGH increase cortical thickness but only FGH prevents the decrease in trabecular BMD seen in Mg-deficient rats, while neither type of gelatin hydrolysate affect intrinsic biomechanical properties.

Highlights

  • The major types of commercially available gelatin hydrolysates are prepared from mammals or fish

  • This study aimed to investigate the effects of fish-derived gelatin hydrolysate (FGH) and porcine-derived gelatin hydrolysate (PGH) intake on bone mineral density (BMD) and intrinsic biomechanical properties in Mg-deficient (MgD) rats as a model showing the decrease in both BMD and intrinsic biomechanical properties

  • There were no significant differences in the C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX)/tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b) ratio between the normal group and the FGH and PGH groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The major types of commercially available gelatin hydrolysates are prepared from mammals or fish. Dietary gelatin hydrolysates from mammals were reported to improve bone mineral density (BMD) in some animal models. Gelatin hydrolysate is produced by the hydrolysis of gelatin, and the major types of commercially available gelatin hydrolysates are prepared from swine or fish. Some researchers reported that dietary gelatin or gelatin hydrolysates from mammals improve BMD in ovariectomized mice [7], growing rats [8], calciumdeficient rats [8], and low protein-fed rats [9]. There is limited study showing the effects of dietary gelatin hydrolysates from fish on BMD [10]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call