Abstract
Mice submitted to chronic alcohol consumption (CAC; 11 months) or to systemic diazepam administration were trained in a spatial reversal learning task. Although CAC-treated mice were able to learn the initial acquisition at normal rates, they were impaired during the first reversal of the discrimination and subsequent reversal sessions. In contrast, diazepam administration induced no deficits for any behavioral measure. In conclusion, CAC, but not diazepam administration, induces an exaggerated sensitivity to proactive interference. The two treatments spared, however, the development of the learning set curve. These results are congruent with clinical data showing that nondeclarative or implicit forms of memory processes are spared in diazepam-treated subjects or in chronic alcoholics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.