Effects of depressurization on gas production and water performance from excess-gas and excess-water methane hydrate accumulations

Abstract

• Various water saturations simulate Classes I and II hydrate deposits in nature. • Ambient temperature controls periphery dissociation in excess-gas hydrate deposits. • Sensible heat dominates spatially uniform dissociation in excess-water deposits. • Secondary hydrate formation are prevented by adjusted gas production pressure. • Optimized depressurization is crucial to improve water production and CH 4 recovery. Depressurization is considered as the most promising technique for hydrate exploitation, as it achieves the highest energy profit ratio and is the most technologically feasible. However, the exploitation of excess-water hydrate accumulations generates high water production, leading to increased cost, poor energy efficiency, and problems with sand during operation. Thus, water management is crucial to gas recovery by the depressurization of different classes of hydrate accumulations, yet relevant studies remain limited. In this study, synthetic hydrate samples were prepared to simulate two types of natural methane hydrate sediments: Class 1 accumulations (excess-gas hydrate) and Class 2 accumulations (excess-water hydrate). Hydrate dissociation was conducted using a variety of depressurization approaches, and MRI imaging was employed to characterize water performance and methane recovery. Methane hydrate preferentially dissociated along the peripheries of the excess-gas samples due to more efficient heat dissipation. Methane hydrate dissociated more uniformly in the excess-water samples because the high specific heat capacity of water enabled the supply of extra heat. Furthermore, pressure histories, mean intensity change in MRI images, and water variations were monitored to analyze the characteristics of hydrate dissociation, changes in porosity, intrinsic permeability and reservoir heat, water and gas production rates, and possible secondary hydrate formation. The results of this study suggest that an optimized depressurization approach, such as stepwise depressurization, could improve methane recovery from Class 1 and Class 2 methane hydrate accumulations.