Abstract
Highlights Winter cover crops and growing season filter strips were implemented without sacrificing significant land and achieved positive results. Cover crops reduced runoff depth, peak flow rate, sediment, TP, and TN load by 30%, 49%, 43%, 4%, and 7%, respectively. Filter strips reduced runoff depth, peak flow rate, sediment, TP, and TN load by 36%, 49%, 56%, 15%, and 21%, respectively. Abstract. Effective use of conservation practices in agricultural fields can reduce sediment and other pollutant loads entering waterways. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of using cover crops and filter strips on sediment and nutrient loss at the edge of paired, 7.83 ha (19.35 ac), commercial cotton fields in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (LMRB) in northeastern Arkansas. Cover crops included winter wheat, black oat, and ryegrass seeded in the winter fallow period, while filter strips included a grassy turn row at the field border and switchgrass transplanted around the drainage pipe at the edge of the treatment field. The field border of the control field was generally free from vegetation. A monitoring system measured discharge and collected composite water samples from rainfall and irrigation runoff events. Water samples were analyzed for phosphate (PO4-P), total phosphorus (TP), nitrate (NO3-N), ammonium (NH4-N), total nitrogen (TN), and suspended sediment concentrations. Data were collected from 2015 to 2020. Baseline data were collected when both fields had similar conservation practices (i.e., no cover crops in 2015 and no filter strips in 2015 and 2016). A comparison of 66 common runoff events between the control and cover crop treatment fields during the non-growing season indicated that the median peak flow and sediment loads were significantly reduced (p < 0.05), with an average reduction of 49% and 43%, respectively. Similarly, a comparison of 55 common runoff events between the control and filter strips treatment fields during the growing season found that the filter strips reduced significantly with average runoff by 36%, peak flow by 49%, and sediment loads by 56% (p < 0.05). Nutrient load reductions by the cover crop and filter strip treatments were not significantly different than by the control (p > 0.05). However, mean PO4-P, TP, NO3-N, NO2-N, NH4-N, and TN loads in the cover crop treatment field were lower than in the control field by 21%, 4%, 9%, 4%, 17%, and 7%, respectively. Similarly, mean PO4-P, TP, NO3-N, NH4-N, and TN loads in the filter strip treatment field were lower than in the control field by 23%, 15%, 11%, 42%, and 21%, respectively. The results demonstrated runoff depth, peak flow rate, nutrients, and sediment load reductions following the implementation of cover crops and filter strips at the commercial field scale. Keywords: Agricultural conservation practices, BMPs, Cotton, Cover crop, Edge-of-field monitoring, Filter strips, Switch grass.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
