Abstract
This article discusses various reactive and predictive controllers, with and without setback, and floor construction, for radiant floor heating in a single-detached house in a cold climate, with high variability in solar gains. Heating energy to the floor and occupant comfort was evaluated. Modeling showed that in general, lower thermal mass floors performed better in cases with lower solar gains variability (lower south-facing glazing area). For high solar gains variability, floors with higher mass tended to provide better comfort, as long as the tubes were located near the surface of the floor. Temperature setback generally was found to provide modest heating energy savings and decreased overheating periods. Proportional–integral–derivative (PID) and outdoor temperature reset with indoor temperature feedback controllers were found to generally perform the best for all cases. It was found that proper selection of controller and floor construction can make a difference in heating energy demand by as much as 25%.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
