Abstract

Metacommunity theory poses that the occurrence and abundance of species is a product of local factors, including disturbance, and regional factors, like dispersal among patches. While metacommunity ideas have been broadly tested there is relatively little work on metacommunities subject to disturbance. We focused on how localized disturbance and dispersal interact to determine species composition in metacommunities. Experiments conducted in simple two-patch habitats containing eight protozoa and rotifer species tested how dispersal altered community composition in both communities that were disturbed and communities that connected to refuge communities not subject to disturbance. While disturbance lowered population densities, in disturbed patches connected to undisturbed patches this was ameliorated by immigration. Furthermore, species with high dispersal abilities or growth rates showed the fastest post-disturbance recovery in presence of immigration. Connectivity helped to counteract the negative effect of disturbances on local populations, allowing mass-effect-driven dispersal of individuals from undisturbed to disturbed patches. In undisturbed patches, however, local population sizes were not significantly reduced by emigration. The absence of a cost of dispersal for undisturbed source populations is consistent with a lack of complex demography in our system, such as age- or sex-specific emigration. Our approach provides an improved way to separate components of population growth from organisms' movement in post-disturbance recovery of (meta)communities. Further studies are required in a variety of ecosystems to investigate the transient dynamics resulting from disturbance and dispersal.

Highlights

  • Metacommunities are defined by dispersal connecting local communities of potentially interacting species [1,2]

  • We addressed three specific questions: (1) Does connectivity between disturbed and undisturbed patches lead to a net immigration to disturbed patches, and if so, does this increase the rate of post-disturbance recovery? (2) Does disturbance in adjacent patches reduce diversity or abundance in undisturbed patches? (3) Which species traits explain post-disturbance recovery of populations?

  • Local species richness of isolated, disturbed communities was not significantly different from local species richness of disturbed patches, which were connected to undisturbed patches and there was no significant effect of the time of sampling on species richness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metacommunities are defined by dispersal connecting local communities of potentially interacting species [1,2]. Many disturbances are highly stochastic, and create both temporal and spatial variability in usable habitat patches [16], and may even increase fragmentation and reduce connectivity [17]. Disturbances such as floods or fires have, by definition, an initial negative effect on existing local communities [16]. Thereby, the effects of a local disturbance might go far beyond the local patch [4]: either by triggering increased dispersal from disturbed into undisturbed patches, or by triggering dispersal from undisturbed to disturbed patches In both cases, the immigrating individuals interact with local resident individuals of a variety of species, and may change local community composition. Immigration may enrich local communities through introduction of resources, adding new individuals that can exponentially multiply in times of abundant resources, or through introducing genetic diversity [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call