Abstract

BackgroundTwo-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is a powerful technique that can non-invasively measure liver stiffness to assess hepatic fibrosis.PurposeThis study aimed to identify the effects of confounding factors, including anesthesia, breathing, and scanning approach, on liver stiffness when performing 2D-SWE in dogs.Materials and MethodsNine healthy Beagle dogs were included in this study. Hepatic 2D-SWE was performed, and liver stiffness was compared between conscious and anesthetized states, free-breathing and breath-holding conditions, and intercostal and subcostal approaches. For the anesthetized state, the breath-holding condition was subdivided into seven phases, which included forced-expiration (5 and 10 mL/kg), end-expiration (0 cm H2O), and forced-inspiration (5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O), and liver stiffness was compared among these phases. Changes in liver stiffness were compared between intercostal and subcostal approaches according to breathing phases.ResultsNo significant difference was observed in liver stiffness between the conscious and anesthetized states or between the free-breathing and breath-holding conditions. No significant difference was noted in liver stiffness among the breathing phases, except for forced-inspiration with high airway pressure (15 and 20 cm H2O in the intercostal approach and 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O in the subcostal approach), which was associated with significantly higher liver stiffness (p < 0.05). Liver stiffness was significantly higher in the subcostal approach than in the intercostal approach (p < 0.05). Changes in liver stiffness were significantly higher in the subcostal approach than in the intercostal approach in all forced-inspiratory phases (p < 0.05).ConclusionIn conclusion, when performing 2D-SWE in dogs, liver stiffness is unaffected by anesthesia and free-breathing. To avoid inadvertent increases in liver stiffness, the deep inspiratory phase and subcostal approach are not recommended. Thus, liver stiffness should be interpreted considering these confounding factors.

Highlights

  • Hepatic fibrosis, which often occurs as a consequence of chronic hepatitis, is a relatively common finding that affects 12% of dogs

  • In the free-breathing condition, no significant difference was observed in liver stiffness between the conscious and anesthetized states for both scanning approaches (p = 0.169 for intercostal approach and p = 0.533 for subcostal approach) (Table 1)

  • No significant difference was observed in liver stiffness in the conscious state between free-breathing and breathholding conditions for both scanning approaches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hepatic fibrosis, which often occurs as a consequence of chronic hepatitis, is a relatively common finding that affects 12% of dogs. US elastography enables the quantitative measurement of liver stiffness based on deformation induced by forces exerted on a tissue [4]. 2D-SWE is a novel method that measures liver stiffness by using acoustic radiation force and inducing shear waves in multiple focal zones. Both anatomical and stiffness information of the liver can be acquired using shearwave propagation and color maps superimposed on B-mode images of the liver parenchyma [4,5,6]. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is a powerful technique that can non-invasively measure liver stiffness to assess hepatic fibrosis. Purpose: This study aimed to identify the effects of confounding factors, including anesthesia, breathing, and scanning approach, on liver stiffness when performing 2D-SWE in dogs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call