Abstract

In one experiment two control groups were run to either an eight-pellet reward or a one-pellet reward and a discrimination group was run to eight pellets on one stimulus and one pellet on a second stimulus. The discrimination group ran slower to the one-pellet stimulus than did the low-reward control group, indicating the presence of a concurrent depression effect. In the second experiment the same design was used but a high sucrose reward was contrasted with a low sucrose reward. The rate of differentiation was retarded in the sucrose experiment compared to the food pellet experiment and no depression effect was observed, although the functional difference between the sucrose rewards was greater than between the food pellet rewards. These data indicate that the difference between sucrose and food pellet rewards obtained in sequential shift experiments is also obtained in concurrent shift experiments.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.