Abstract

Schofield (1981) demonstrated a degree of incompatibility in simultaneously maximizing pupils' cognitive and affective outcomes in elementary school mathematics. In contrast, computer-assisted instruction (CAI) incorporates elements that should facilitate accomplishing both goals. This study was conducted to investigate the impact of CAI on the mathematical achievement and self-concept as well as the perception of the quality of school life among disadvantaged boys and girls in third, fourth, and fifth grades (V = 376). Results indicated that in a combined CAI-traditional program, as oppossed to only traditional instruction, students consistently scored higher on both cognitive and affective measures while grade level and gender were generally nonsignificant. Differences between this study and previous research are discussed as well as the differential influence of CAI and traditional instruction on disadvantaged pupils.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call