Abstract
An experiment is reported in which the interpretation of adjective-noun combinations was investigated. Semantic characteristics of adjectives and nouns were varied. Central adjectives were members of pairs of frequent antonyms (e.g., big-small, wet-dry). Peripheral adjectives were near-synonyms of such antonyms (e.g., sturdy, swampy). Compared to central adjectives, peripheral adjectives have additional collocational restrictions that account for their more restricted usages. Combinations contained nouns in which dimensions that matched the collocational restrictions of the peripheral adjectives were of high or low salience. A speeded classification task for meaningfulness was used. Combinations consisting of peripheral adjectives and low salient nouns resulted in particularly low percentages of meaningful responses. The results confirm important predictions of schema-based theory, but they also point to required elaborations of this theory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
