Abstract

Environmental effects—temperature and moisture—on 3D printed part dimensional accuracy are explored. The coefficient of thermal expansion of four different nylon materials was determined for XY and ZX print orientations, with 0°, 45°/−45°, and 90° infill patterns. Unreinforced nylon exhibited a thermal expansion coefficient of the same order regardless of condition (from 11.4 to 17.5 × 10−5 1/°C), while nylons reinforced with discontinuous carbon fiber were highly anisotropic, for instance exhibiting 2.2 × 10−5 1/°C in the flow direction (0° infill angle) and 24.8 × 10−5 1/°C in the ZX orientation. The temperature profile of a part during printing is shown, demonstrating a build steady state temperature of ~ 35 °C. The effect of moisture uptake by the part was also explored, with dimensional changes of ~0.5–1.5% seen depending on feature, with height expanding the most. The effects of moisture were significantly reduced for large flat parts with the inclusion of continuous fiber reinforcement throughout the part.

Highlights

  • The 3D printing industry grew over 25% per year for the past decade, representing over $12B USD in 2020 in revenues [1]

  • Fused filament fabrication (FFF) technology, which involves laying down a bead of thermoplastic in a layer-bylayer fashion, was pioneered over 30 years ago and has become a dominant 3D printing technology [2]

  • This paper studies the effects of coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and moisture in the printed parts using both micro carbon fiber filled and unfilled nylon-based polymers to aid in the better design of accurate end-use parts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 3D printing industry grew over 25% per year for the past decade, representing over $12B USD in 2020 in revenues [1]. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) technology, which involves laying down a bead of thermoplastic in a layer-bylayer fashion, was pioneered over 30 years ago and has become a dominant 3D printing technology [2]. As plastic part properties are highly dependent on the processing method used, for instance due to cooling rates or flow conditions, one may assume that bulk material properties from injection molded samples may not align with those of additively manufactured parts. A strong understanding of the FFF process, parameters, and resulting microstructure is required to give confidence in the material properties and facilitate widespread adoption of end-use 3D printed parts

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call