Abstract

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) opens new ways across the industries and helps to produce complex products, yielding a prototype or finished product. However, it should be noted that the final products need high surface quality due to their better mechanical properties. The main purpose of this research was to determine the influence of computer numerical control (CNC) machining on the surface quality and identify the average surface roughness (Ra) and average peak to valley height (Rz) when the specimens were printed and machined in various build orientations. In this study, the study samples were printed and machined to investigate the effects of machining on FDM products and generate a surface comparison between the two processes. In particular, the block and complex specimens were printed in different build orientations, whereby other parameters were kept constant to understand the effects of orientation on surface smoothness. As a result, wide-ranging values of Ra and Rz were found in both processes for each profile due to their different features. The Ra values for the block samples, printed samples, and machined samples were 21, 91, and 52, respectively, whereas the Rz values were identical to Ra values in all samples. These results indicated that the horizontal surface roughness yielded the best quality compared to the perpendicular and vertical specimens. Moreover, machining was found to show a great influence on thermoplastics in which the surfaces became smooth in the machined samples. In brief, this research showed that build orientation had a great effect on the surface texture for both processes.

Highlights

  • Nowadays, manufactured products are getting more complex and requiring more tasks undertaken in their product development stage

  • Many parameters have an effect on surface roughness, surface quality during the printing process, such as product design, geometry, and material properties

  • The Fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printer produced blocks and complex samples with different surface roughness, while works detailing different factors and parameters affecting the surfaces produced by additive manufacturing (AM) were included

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nowadays, manufactured products are getting more complex and requiring more tasks undertaken in their product development stage. Vehicle components are improving and many difficulties have been noted in producing complex products in the industry. The features of these components are mostly complex, consisting of fillets, chamfer, and circles. Rapid prototyping (RP), which is formerly known as additive manufacturing (AM), is the foundation for a large number of manufacturing techniques involving fusing of materials layer-by-layer. Scale models in the construction field, implants and prosthetic hand in the medical field, rear wing, jigs, and fixtures in automotive and manufacturing fields, and toys in the assembly section are a few examples which can be handled by AM. Reducing the material waste, time, cost, and errors

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call