Abstract
The present study examined the generality of Shum, McFarland, Bain, and Humphreys' (1990) findings that closed-head injury (CHI) selectively impairs different processes of attention (operationalized in terms of stages of information processing) depending on the severity of, and the time since, injury. The procedure of Shum et al. was based on Sternberg's additive factor method (AFM), with the mode of information processing involved being a physical-directional matching of visual stimuli. The present study followed a similar procedure except that a name-matching task was used. This task was administered to 16 first-year psychology students and two groups of CHI patients (viz., severe short-term (SS) and severe long-term (SL)) with matched control groups. The results obtained replicated the study by Shum in that the SS group was found to be impaired on the identification and response-selection stages of information processing whereas the SL group was found to be impaired only on the response-selection stage. The present study confirms that the AFM is not limited to one specific mode of information process and strengthens the validity of the conclusions made by Shum et al. regarding the effects of CHI on attention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.