Abstract

To better understand the effects of cloning on observations of fungal ITS sequences from Picea glauca (white spruce) roots two techniques were compared: (i) direct sequencing of fungal ITS regions from individual root tips without cloning and (ii) cloning and sequencing of fungal ITS regions from individual root tips. Effect of root tip size was investigated by selecting 20 small root tips (SRT, 1.0–2.0 mm long) and 20 large root tips (LRT, 5.0–6.0 mm long). DNA was isolated from each tip and PCR-amplified with fungal-specific primers. PCR reactions were divided into two portions, one of which was sequenced directly and one of which was cloned first followed by sequencing of 12 random clones. With direct sequencing all 20 SRT produced an identifiable sequence, while only 13 of 20 LRT (65%) yielded an identifiable sequence. With cloning and sequencing all 40 tips produced identifiable fungal ITS sequences regardless of size. Failure of direct sequencing in LRT was associated with the presence of multispecies assemblages. Cloning identified 18 taxa overall while direct sequencing identified four. Cloning was not affected by tip size and identified more taxa relative to direct sequencing, although cost and probability of observing lab-based contaminants (e.g. airborne or reagent-based) were higher. We suggest that standardized controls be run whenever clones are sequenced from environmental samples, including positive controls derived from pure cultures and negative controls that cover the entire extraction, amplification and cloning process. Additional studies on larger root segments and bulked samples are needed to determine whether cloning can detect fungi accurately and cost-effectively in complex environmental samples.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.