Abstract

AbstractHumans have altered nearly every natural disturbance regime on the planet through climate and land‐use change, and in many instances, these processes may have interacting effects. For example, projected shifts in temperature and precipitation will likely influence disturbance regimes already affected by anthropogenic fire suppression or river impoundments. Understanding how disturbance‐dependent species respond to complex and interacting environmental changes is important for conservation efforts. Using field‐based demographic and movement rates, we conducted a metapopulation viability analysis for piping plovers (Charadrius melodus), a threatened disturbance‐dependent species, along the Missouri and Platte rivers in the Great Plains of North America. Our aim was to better understand current and projected future metapopulation dynamics given that natural disturbances (flooding or high‐flow events) have been greatly reduced by river impoundments and that climate change could further alter the disturbance regime. Although metapopulation abundance has been substantially reduced under the current suppressed disturbance regime (high‐flow return interval ~ 20 yr), it could grow if the frequency of high‐flow events increases as predicted under likely climate change scenarios. We found that a four‐year return interval would maximize metapopulation abundance, and all subpopulations in the metapopulation would act as sources at a return interval of 15 yr or less. Regardless of disturbance frequency, the presence of even a small, stable source subpopulation buffered the metapopulation and sustained a low metapopulation extinction risk. Therefore, climate change could have positive effects in ecosystems where disturbances have been anthropogenically suppressed when climatic shifts move disturbance regimes toward more historical patterns. Furthermore, stable source populations, even if unintentionally maintained through anthropogenic activities, may be critical for the persistence of metapopulations of early‐successional species under both suppressed disturbance regimes and disturbance regimes where climate change has further altered disturbance frequency or scope.

Highlights

  • Resource management has historically followed a command and control approach in an effort to optimize economic gains and minimize unpredictable outcomes or events, such as insect outbreaks, fires, and floods (Holling and Meffe 1996)

  • The metapopulation considered in this study, which supports approximately 14% of the Northern Great Plains piping plover population (Elliot-Smith et al 2009), was composed of three subpopulations on the lower Platte River (PLT) and the Missouri River at Lewis and Clark Lake (LCL) and Gavins Point Reach (GVP; Fig. 1)

  • A true metapopulation does not exist. § For all scenarios listed here where the high-flow return interval (FRI) is

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Resource management has historically followed a command and control approach in an effort to optimize economic gains and minimize unpredictable outcomes or events, such as insect outbreaks, fires, and floods (Holling and Meffe 1996). The result is most often “the pathology of natural resource management” where natural disturbances are suppressed, natural variation is reduced, and ecosystems become vulnerable to undesirable change (Holling and Meffe 1996, Seidl et al 2016). These types of ecosystem modifications have made disturbance-dependent organisms especially vulnerable to extinction (e.g., Brawn et al 2001, Lawler et al 2002), species that evolved in landscapes with historically frequent disturbances (Martin and Fahrig 2016). Regime changes can accelerate shifts in species composition, alter biome boundaries, and lead to state changes and “no analogue” communities (Turner 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call