Abstract

The purpose of this work was to elucidate the repercussion of changing pH, incubation time and As(V) competition on fluoride (F−) sorption on forest and vineyard soil samples, pyritic, and granitic materials, as well as on the by-products pine sawdust, oak wood ash, mussel shell ash, fine and coarse mussel shell, and slate processing waste fines. To reach this end, the methodological approach was based on batch-type experiments. The results indicate that, for most materials, F− sorption was very high at the start, but was clearly diminished when the pH value increased. However, oak wood ash and shell ash showed high F− sorption even at alkaline pH, and pine sawdust showed low F− sorption for any pH value. Specifically, F− sorption was close to 100% for both ashes at pH < 6, and around 70% at pH 10, while for forest soil it was close to 90% at pH < 2, and around 60% at pH values near 8. Regarding the effect of incubation time on F− sorption, it was very low for both soils, pyritic material, granitic material, and both kinds of ashes, as all of them showed very rapid F− sorption from the start, with differences being lesser than 10% between sorption at 30 min and 1 month of incubation. However, sawdust and slate fines sorbed 20% of added F− in 30 min, remaining constant up to 12 h, and doubling after 30 days. And finally, mussel shell sorbed 20% at 30 min, increasing to close to 60% when incubation time was 30 days. This means that some of the materials showed a first sorption phase characterized by rapid F− sorption, and a slower sorption in a second phase. As regards the effect of the presence of As(V) on F− sorption, it was almost negligible, indicating the absence of competition for sorption sites. In view of that all, these results could aid to appropriately manage soils and by-products when focusing on F− removal, in circumstances where pH value changes, contact time vary from hours to days, and potential competition between F− and As(V) could take place.

Highlights

  • Fluoride (F−) is present in rocks, soil, air, water, and plants

  • Taking all that into account, in this research we focused on the effects of changing pH, incubation time, and As(V) competition, on F− retention capacity on different soil samples, pyritic and granitic materials, as well as on different by-products: pine sawdust, oak wood ash, mussel shell ash, fine and coarse mussel shell, and slate processing waste fines

  • In this study we tested the effect of pH, incubation time and As(V) competition on F− sorption, using a forest soil sample, a vineyard soil sample, pyritic material, granitic material, fine mussel shell, coarse mussel shell, mussel shell ash, oak wood ash, pine sawdust, and slate processing fines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluoride (F−) is present in rocks, soil, air, water, and plants. While low intake of F− can be beneficial for teeth in humans (preventing caries) and bone growth, excessive F− concentrations can result in fluorosis and other adverse effects on human health, such as those regarding correct mental development in children, as previously shown by Oruc (2008), Yadav et al (2009), Patel et al (2014), and Yesilnacar et al (2016). Cronin et al (2003) and Kumar et al (2014) indicated that the geological substrate is of great importance regarding F− concentration in soils, taking into account its presence in minerals such as apatite, topaz, cryolite, and fluorite. Other authors, such as Gago et al (2002), Weinstein and Davison (2004), and Gago et al (2014), have signaled that industrial sources are important, especially aluminum and phosphate-fertilizer factories. Long-term phosphate fertilization on farmlands may cause very relevant F− accumulation in soils (Loganathan et al, 2008; Kim et al, 2016), because F− concentrations in P fertilizers are much higher (up to 150 times) than in soils (Stacey et al, 2010). Kalinic et al (2005) reported that 300–500 mg kg−1 are normal values for total-F in soils, while, as commented by Brougham et al (2013), concentrations higher than 500–600 mg kg−1 are indicative of F-rich minerals, industrial or agricultural pollution

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.