Abstract

Aims/hypothesisType 2 diabetes mellitus can manifest over a broad clinical range, although there is no clear consensus on the categorisation of disease complexity. We assessed the effects of canagliflozin, compared with placebo, on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program over a range of type 2 diabetes mellitus complexity, defined separately by baseline intensity of treatment, duration of diabetes and glycaemic control.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of the effects of canagliflozin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) according to baseline glucose-lowering treatments (0 or 1, 2 or 3+ non-insulin glucose-lowering treatments, or insulin-based treatment), duration of diabetes (<10, 10 to 16, >16 years) and HbA1c (≤53.0 mmol/mol [<7.0%], >53.0 to 58.5 mmol/mol [>7.0% to 7.5%], >58.5 to 63.9 mmol/mol [>7.5 to 8.0%], >63.9 to 69.4 mmol/mol [8.0% to 8.5%], >69.4 to 74.9 mmol/mol [>8.5 to 9.0%] or >74.9 mmol/mol [>9.0%]). We analysed additional secondary endpoints for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, including a combined kidney outcome of sustained 40% decline in eGFR, end-stage kidney disease or death due to kidney disease. We used Cox regression analyses and compared the constancy of HRs across subgroups by fitting an interaction term (p value for significance <0.05).ResultsAt study initiation, 5095 (50%) CANVAS Program participants were treated with insulin, 2100 (21%) had an HbA1c > 74.9 mmol/mol (9.0%) and the median duration of diabetes was 12.6 years (interquartile interval 8.0–18 years). Canagliflozin reduced MACE (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75, 0.97]) with no evidence that the benefit differed between subgroups defined by the number of glucose-lowering treatments, the duration of diabetes or baseline HbA1c (all p-heterogeneity >0.17). Canagliflozin reduced MACE in participants receiving insulin with no evidence that the benefit differed from other participants in the trial (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.72, 1.00]). Similar results were observed for other cardiovascular outcomes and for the combined kidney outcome (HR for combined kidney outcome 0.60 [95% CI 0.47, 0.77]), with all p-heterogeneity >0.37.Conclusions/interpretationIn people with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk, there was no evidence that cardiovascular and renal protection with canagliflozin differed across subgroups defined by baseline treatment intensity, duration of diabetes or HbA1c.Graphical abstract

Highlights

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease, and individuals included in large trials vary widely in terms of their glycaemic control and treatment management strategies

  • The intensity of diabetes treatment is a surrogate marker of diabetes complexity in the context of international guidelines framed around glycaemic control [3]

  • 5095 (50%) CANVAS Program participants were treated with insulin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease, and individuals included in large trials vary widely in terms of their glycaemic control and treatment management strategies. The intensity of diabetes treatment is a surrogate marker of diabetes complexity in the context of international guidelines framed around glycaemic control [3]. Disease duration is another possible variable to describe disease complexity and is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk, reflecting an underlying progressive disease course [1, 4, 5]. HbA1c level is a biochemical predictor of the development of microvascular complications [6,7,8], reflected in HbA1c thresholds appearing as targets for guideline-directed therapy [8,9,10] Overall, these variables represent different aspects of a heterogeneous disease

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call