Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: the purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of budget participation on management attitudes, job satisfaction, and managerial performance of controllers of Brazilian companies. Methodology: a descriptive, survey, and quantitative research was conducted from a sample of 316 individuals with budgetary responsibility. Results: the results indicated that budgetary participation directly and positively influences managerial attitudes toward budgeting, job satisfaction, and controllers’ performance in budget activities. Indirect relationships revealed that managerial attitudes toward budget and job satisfaction mediate the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance. It was found that budgetary participation positively influences the level of use of the budget for the purposes of performance evaluation and contributes to the development of budgetary knowledge of managers. Conclusion: the budgetary participation is responsible for important consequences on the attitudes and performance of these professionals. From a managerial point of view, it is essential to understand how the budgeting process can influence the attitudes, satisfaction, and performance of controllers in the budgeting context, since after this understanding, the managerial functions can be improved.

Highlights

  • The budget is a tool used for management control (Frezatti, 2009), and in addition to the control function, it has the ability to influence the attitudes and behaviors of individuals at work (Merchant, 1981; Covaleski, Evans III, Luft, & Shields, 2007)

  • This study investigated the effects of budgetary participation on managerial attitudes, job satisfaction, and managerial performance with a sample of 316 controllers from Brazilian companies with budget responsibility

  • The results indicated that among the investigated controllers the level of budgetary participation and managerial performance differ

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The budget is a tool used for management control (Frezatti, 2009), and in addition to the control function, it has the ability to influence the attitudes and behaviors of individuals at work (Merchant, 1981; Covaleski, Evans III, Luft, & Shields, 2007). Among the many reasons the literature lists for budgetary participation, the following stand out: the opportunity for information sharing (Kyj & Parker, 2008), motivation (Merchant, 2007; Kyj & Parker, 2008) and employee satisfaction (Kyj & Parker, 2008), organizational justice perception communication (Kyj & Parker, 2008), open communication and employee interaction (Lavarda & Almeida, 2013), increased positive attitudes (Merchant, 2007), and increased work performance (Argyris, 1952; Kenis, 1979; Mia, 1988; Nouri & Parker, 1998; Zonatto, 2014; Jacomossi et al, 2018; Degenhart et al, 2019; Lunardi et al, 2020) Given this behavioral approach, budgeting has been analyzed as a means to influence the behavior of the individuals involved

METHODOLOGICAL PROCEDURES
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call