Abstract

Traditionally, studies of delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) tasks in nonhuman species have focused on the assessment of the limits of the retrieval of information stored in short- and long-term memory systems. However, it is still unclear if visual recognition in these tasks is affected by very brief delay intervals, which are typically used to study rapidly decaying types of visual memory. This study aimed at evaluating if tufted capuchin monkeys’ ability to recognise visual stimuli in a DMTS task is affected by (i) the disappearance of the sample stimulus and (ii) the introduction of delay intervals (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0s) between the disappearance of the sample and the presentation of the comparison stimuli. The results demonstrated that the simple disappearance of the sample and the introduction of a delay of 0.5s did not affect capuchins’ performance either in terms of accuracy or response time. A delay interval of 1.0s produced a significant increase in response time but still did not affect recognition accuracy. By contrast, delays of 2.0 and 3.0s determined a significant increase in response time and a reduction in recognition accuracy. These findings indicate the existence in capuchin monkeys of processes enabling a very accurate retention of stimulus features within time frames comparable to those reported for humans’ sensory memory (0.5–1.0s). The extent to which such processes can be considered analogous to the sensory memory processes observed in human visual cognition is discussed.

Highlights

  • Nonhuman primates are widely used as animal models of human memory in cognitive neuroscience (e.g., [1])

  • A delay interval of 1.0 second produced a significant increase in response time but still did not affect recognition accuracy

  • It has been argued that the temporary permanence of 32 information that enters the sensory store allows the visual system to select which aspects of the input should be elaborated by further memory processing before it is eliminated from this preliminary store [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nonhuman primates are widely used as animal models of human memory in cognitive neuroscience (e.g., [1]). To assess the plausibility of such models it is important to gather as much information as possible concerning similarities and difference among memory. In this model, each store has a different duration, capacity and mode 27 of encoding. Despite the ubiquity of this sensory store in models of visual processing, the relationship between sensory memory processes and the subsequent short-term elaboration of visual information is still to be fully understood. It is not clear which visual memory tasks are supported by long-lasting sensory memory processes or by early short-term memory processes [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call